Is Money Killing Sport?
Is Money Killing Sport? Is Money Killing Sport? Recent news in the UK has highlighted two knights of the world. The loss of life was announced of Sir Roger Bannister, the athlete who ran the first four-minute mile in Oxford in 1954 and was later knighted for his efforts to medicine. Bannister competed in the amateur era and was said to have produced no financial benefit from sport.
On the other hand, Sir Bradley Wiggins, performed in the present day era in which all top notch sport is professional and richly rewarded. Another interesting reflection on trends in modern sport was provided recently by FIFA’s decision to permit the utilization of TV monitoring facilities in soccer matches to aid referees’ decisions. Various systems are already in use in cricket and rugby, where spectators are shown replays on a sizable TV screen. However, replays of action will not be displayed in this way at soccer matches on the grounds that fans would not anticipate to acknowledge marginal decisions that go against their team. That is surely a severe condemnation of a sport by its own ruling body, and shows from what depths ethics and sportsmanship have sunk in this most commercialised of sports activities.
If we were to judge work by quality, then it is no secret that the working environment would soon delve into that of a Bureacracy — where more resources are spent on governing the work than doing the actual work. This would be counterproductive for obvious reasons. If we were to have judges to measure the quality of work, it might be too extended of a process and too obstructive of a free working environment.
A worker should be paid on the amount of work that they do. For example, within an assembly line, a worker would be paid for each device that they focus on. On a farm, a worker would be paid for each bale of hay they could get from a machine, or for each row of land they were capable of harvesting with a tractor.
- What should be the end to get rid of cycle time of the business process
- Launch a containment intend to prevent cross-contamination between work and home
- Incentivize contractor compliance and manage risk efficiently through sturdy risk evaluation
- Hyundai Sun Bowl Miami (8-4) Wash St. (8-4) 2.5/5
- Keep an eyesight on the competition
- Speech writing
In transportation, they might be paid for every mile these were capable of generating. And so forth, with the different sectors and the marks of production they keep. 10 would go to the workers. 3.33 per table worked on. However, then it must be studied under consideration that one job may become more difficult or stressing than another job.
For example, the technology for painting the tables was antiquated perhaps, which would lead to making it sloppy for those working that position, and for that reason it got these to complete the duty and more effort longer. 2.50 per unit they done. In the final end, a person is rewarded exactly for the quantity of work that they enact upon the product.
This is fairness, this is justice, which is the kind of economy I would desire. Just how many units are to be made per industry, and who makes this decision? Since this might be an Anarchistic community, where decision are made the decision by people and not with a person, the answer is quite clear: systems to be made per industry should be made the decision Democratically by the city. Of course, the complication that arrises is that it would appear to be an extremely tedious and boring job. One solution is the community could hire several consultants to choose for all of them — however, not absolutely.
The consultants could research the matter, and then recommend to the community an amount per industry that should be made. The study would be based upon the statistics of how many people are purchasing what items and the factors of how that may change. Of course, if a culture believes that a consultant’s predictions are off, they have the right to change it — Democratically, as all decisions are created.